>>> LAST NIGHT FRESHMAN >>> LAST NIGHT FRESHMAN CALIFORNIA CONGRESSWOMAN KATIE CALIFORNIA CONGRESSWOMAN KATIE PORTER CAME OUT IN FAVOR OF PORTER CAME OUT IN FAVOR OF BEGINNING THE IMPEACHMENT BEGINNING THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP.

PROCESS AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP.

HERE’S WHAT CONGRESSWOMAN PORTER HERE’S WHAT CONGRESSWOMAN PORTER SAID HERE ABOUT IMPEACHMENT SAID HERE ABOUT IMPEACHMENT THREE WEEKS AGO.

THREE WEEKS AGO.

>> YOU’RE REPRESENTING A >> YOU’RE REPRESENTING A FORMERLY REPUBLICAN DISTRICT.

FORMERLY REPUBLICAN DISTRICT.

POSSIBLY STILL REPUBLICAN POSSIBLY STILL REPUBLICAN DISTRICT.

DISTRICT.

THE LAST 50 YEARS IT’S BEEN A THE LAST 50 YEARS IT’S BEEN A REPUBLICAN DISTRICT.

REPUBLICAN DISTRICT.

DOES THAT INHIBIT YOUR THINKING DOES THAT INHIBIT YOUR THINKING IN YOUR PUBLIC STATEMENTS ABOUT IN YOUR PUBLIC STATEMENTS ABOUT IMPEACHMENT? IMPEACHMENT? >> IT DOES NOT.

>> IT DOES NOT.

THIS IS AN ISSUE ABOUT WHAT WE THIS IS AN ISSUE ABOUT WHAT WE OWE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

OWE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

AND I DON’T CARE WHO YOU VOTE AND I DON’T CARE WHO YOU VOTE FOR OR WHAT PARTY YOU’RE FOR OR WHAT PARTY YOU’RE REGISTERED IN, YOU’RE OWED A REGISTERED IN, YOU’RE OWED A GOVERNMENT THAT FOLLOWS THE LAW, GOVERNMENT THAT FOLLOWS THE LAW, YOU’RE OWED A PRESIDENT WHO YOU’RE OWED A PRESIDENT WHO RESPECTS OUR CONSTITUTION, WHO RESPECTS OUR CONSTITUTION, WHO RESPECTS THE CHECKS AND BALANCES RESPECTS THE CHECKS AND BALANCES IN OUR DEMOCRACY.

IN OUR DEMOCRACY.

>> AND LAST NIGHT IN A VIDEO >> AND LAST NIGHT IN A VIDEO ANNOUNCEMENT OF HER — TO HER ANNOUNCEMENT OF HER — TO HER CONSTITUENTS RELEASED ON CONSTITUENTS RELEASED ON TWITTER, CONGRESSWOMAN PORTER TWITTER, CONGRESSWOMAN PORTER SAID THIS — SAID THIS — >> I’VE SPENT HOURS READING AND >> I’VE SPENT HOURS READING AND ANALYZING THE CONSTITUTION, ANALYZING THE CONSTITUTION, ARTICLES WRITTEN BY LEADING ARTICLES WRITTEN BY LEADING SCHOLARS AND THE 200-YEAR SCHOLARS AND THE 200-YEAR HISTORY OF OUR DEMOCRACY AND ITS HISTORY OF OUR DEMOCRACY AND ITS SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES.

SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES.

AFTER WEEKS OF STUDY, AFTER WEEKS OF STUDY, DELIBERATION AND CONVERSATIONS DELIBERATION AND CONVERSATIONS WITH ORANGE COUNTY FAMILIES, I WITH ORANGE COUNTY FAMILIES, I HAVE DECIDED TO SUPPORT AN HAVE DECIDED TO SUPPORT AN IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION OF THE IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION OF THE PRESIDENT.

PRESIDENT.

>> JOINING US NOW IS >> JOINING US NOW IS REPRESENTATIVE KATIE PORTER, REPRESENTATIVE KATIE PORTER, FRESHMAN DEMOCRAT FROM FRESHMAN DEMOCRAT FROM CALIFORNIA.

CALIFORNIA.

CONGRESSWOMAN, THANK YOU VERY CONGRESSWOMAN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TONIGHT.

MUCH FOR JOINING US TONIGHT.

WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO THIS WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO THIS DECISION? DECISION? I KNOW YOU SAID IN YOUR VIDEO I KNOW YOU SAID IN YOUR VIDEO THAT YOU APPROACHED THIS THAT YOU APPROACHED THIS DECISION RELUCTANTLY.

DECISION RELUCTANTLY.

>> I REALLY TOOK MY TIME TO >> I REALLY TOOK MY TIME TO STUDY THE REPORT.

STUDY THE REPORT.

I’VE TRIED TO DO THAT WITH EVERY I’VE TRIED TO DO THAT WITH EVERY ISSUE, WHETHER IT’S BEEN ISSUE, WHETHER IT’S BEEN THINKING ABOUT HOW TO APPROACH A THINKING ABOUT HOW TO APPROACH A FINANCIAL SERVICES ISSUE, A FINANCIAL SERVICES ISSUE, A CONSUMER PROTECTION ISSUE, A CONSUMER PROTECTION ISSUE, A HEALTH CARE ISSUE, I’VE TRIED TO HEALTH CARE ISSUE, I’VE TRIED TO TAKE THE TIME TO LEARN THE TAKE THE TIME TO LEARN THE FACTS, AND THAT’S REALLY WHAT I FACTS, AND THAT’S REALLY WHAT I DID IN THIS CASE, IS UNDERSTAND DID IN THIS CASE, IS UNDERSTAND THAT THE FACTS AS SET FORTH IN THAT THE FACTS AS SET FORTH IN MUELLER’S REPORT ARE — SHOW MUELLER’S REPORT ARE — SHOW THAT THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL THAT THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE PRESIDENT EVIDENCE THAT THE PRESIDENT ENGAGED IN AT LEAST FOUR ACTS OF ENGAGED IN AT LEAST FOUR ACTS OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

EACH ONE OF WHICH IS A POTENTIAL EACH ONE OF WHICH IS A POTENTIAL CRIME.

CRIME.

>> YOU ARE ONE OF THE NEW >> YOU ARE ONE OF THE NEW MEMBERS WHO IN MOST OF THE MEMBERS WHO IN MOST OF THE POLITICAL READINGS OF THE POLITICAL READINGS OF THE CURRENT SITUATION, YOU’RE ONE OF CURRENT SITUATION, YOU’RE ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO SPEAKER PELOSI THE PEOPLE WHO SPEAKER PELOSI HAS BEEN TRYING TO PROTECT FROM HAS BEEN TRYING TO PROTECT FROM THE IMPEACHMENT DECISION BECAUSE THE IMPEACHMENT DECISION BECAUSE THERE IS THIS POLITICAL CALCULUS THERE IS THIS POLITICAL CALCULUS THAT IN SWING DISTRICTS LIKE THAT IN SWING DISTRICTS LIKE YOURS THIS WILL BE A VERY YOURS THIS WILL BE A VERY UNPOPULAR VOICE, THIS WILL MAKE UNPOPULAR VOICE, THIS WILL MAKE YOUR OWN RE-ELECTION MORE YOUR OWN RE-ELECTION MORE DIFFICULT.

DIFFICULT.

>> I DIDN’T RUN FOR CONGRESS AND >> I DIDN’T RUN FOR CONGRESS AND I DON’T COME EVERY WEEK TO I DON’T COME EVERY WEEK TO WASHINGTON, D.

C.

TO DO WHAT’S WASHINGTON, D.

C.

TO DO WHAT’S EASY, I COME TO DO WHAT’S RIGHT, EASY, I COME TO DO WHAT’S RIGHT, AND SO POLITICS HAS NO PART IN AND SO POLITICS HAS NO PART IN THIS KIND OF A DECISION.

THIS KIND OF A DECISION.

THIS IS REALLY ABOUT ANALYZING THIS IS REALLY ABOUT ANALYZING THE LAW AND THE FACTS AS THEY THE LAW AND THE FACTS AS THEY WERE GATHERED BY THE SPECIAL WERE GATHERED BY THE SPECIAL COUNSEL AND THEN DOING WHAT I COUNSEL AND THEN DOING WHAT I THINK IS RIGHT.

THINK IS RIGHT.

SO THERE MAY OR MAY NOT BE SO THERE MAY OR MAY NOT BE POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THIS, POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THIS, BUT THAT CAN’T GUIDE MY BUT THAT CAN’T GUIDE MY DECISION.

DECISION.

THAT WOULDN’T BE DOING MY DUTY THAT WOULDN’T BE DOING MY DUTY TO MY CONSTITUENTS IF I ALLOWED TO MY CONSTITUENTS IF I ALLOWED POLITICS TO TRUMP WHAT I BELIEVE POLITICS TO TRUMP WHAT I BELIEVE IS RIGHT.

IS RIGHT.

>> HOW MUCH DID YOU TALK ABOUT >> HOW MUCH DID YOU TALK ABOUT IMPEACHMENT DURING YOUR IMPEACHMENT DURING YOUR CAMPAIGN? CAMPAIGN? >> DURING MY CAMPAIGN I ALMOST >> DURING MY CAMPAIGN I ALMOST NEVER SPOKE ABOUT IT UNLESS NEVER SPOKE ABOUT IT UNLESS DIRECTLY ASKED, AND AT ALL TIMES DIRECTLY ASKED, AND AT ALL TIMES I SAID THE SAME THING, WHICH IS I SAID THE SAME THING, WHICH IS WE HAVE TO ALLOW MR.

MUELLER TO WE HAVE TO ALLOW MR.

MUELLER TO DO HIS INVESTIGATION.

DO HIS INVESTIGATION.

>> AND WHAT ABOUT VOTERS IN YOUR >> AND WHAT ABOUT VOTERS IN YOUR DISTRICT WHO MIGHT THINK, OH, DISTRICT WHO MIGHT THINK, OH, YOU KNOW, SHE DIDN’T SAY YOU KNOW, SHE DIDN’T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT IT DURING THE ANYTHING ABOUT IT DURING THE CAMPAIGN AND NOW HERE SHE IS CAMPAIGN AND NOW HERE SHE IS DOING SOMETHING, MAKING A BIG DOING SOMETHING, MAKING A BIG DECISION THAT SHE COULD HAVE DECISION THAT SHE COULD HAVE TOLD US ABOUT DURING THE TOLD US ABOUT DURING THE CAMPAIGN.

CAMPAIGN.

>> I REALLY COULDN’T HAVE SHARED >> I REALLY COULDN’T HAVE SHARED THIS INFORMATION UNTIL NOW THIS INFORMATION UNTIL NOW BECAUSE WHAT I’M DOING IS USING BECAUSE WHAT I’M DOING IS USING THE FACTS AND THE EVIDENCE THAT THE FACTS AND THE EVIDENCE THAT MR.

MUELLER FOUND IN ORDER TO MR.

MUELLER FOUND IN ORDER TO MAKE MY CONCLUSION THAT WE NEED MAKE MY CONCLUSION THAT WE NEED TO BEGIN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.

TO BEGIN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.

SO I WAS NOT IN MR.

MUELLER’S SO I WAS NOT IN MR.

MUELLER’S SHOES.

SHOES.

I DIDN’T KNOW WHAT HE WAS I DIDN’T KNOW WHAT HE WAS FINDING.

FINDING.

AND LIKE THE REST OF THE AND LIKE THE REST OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, I HAD TO ALLOW AMERICAN PUBLIC, I HAD TO ALLOW HIM TO DO HIS JOB.

HIM TO DO HIS JOB.

BUT WHEN HE COMES FORWARD AND BUT WHEN HE COMES FORWARD AND SAYS THAT THERE ARE FOUR — AT SAYS THAT THERE ARE FOUR — AT LEAST FOUR COUNTS OF OBSTRUCTION LEAST FOUR COUNTS OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND THERE IS OF JUSTICE AND THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTING SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ALL FOUR OF THOSE COUNTS THEN ALL FOUR OF THOSE COUNTS THEN IT’S MY JOB TO PICK UP THAT IT’S MY JOB TO PICK UP THAT EVIDENCE AND MAKE A DECISION, EVIDENCE AND MAKE A DECISION, AND THAT’S WHAT I’VE DONE HERE.

AND THAT’S WHAT I’VE DONE HERE.

>> LET’S LISTEN TO WHAT ANOTHER >> LET’S LISTEN TO WHAT ANOTHER CALIFORNIA MEMBER OF CONGRESS, CALIFORNIA MEMBER OF CONGRESS, CHAIRMAN ADAM SCHIFF OF THE CHAIRMAN ADAM SCHIFF OF THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, SAID ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.

SAID ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.

>> REGARDLESS OF HOW PEOPLE COME >> REGARDLESS OF HOW PEOPLE COME OUT IN TERMS OF WHETHER THIS IS OUT IN TERMS OF WHETHER THIS IS THE RIGHT THING AT THE RIGHT THE RIGHT THING AT THE RIGHT TIME, PEOPLE DO NEED TO BE AWARE TIME, PEOPLE DO NEED TO BE AWARE THAT THERE’S A PERCEPTION THAT THAT THERE’S A PERCEPTION THAT IF WE ANNOUNCE AN IMPEACHMENT IF WE ANNOUNCE AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY TOMORROW THINGS CHANGE INQUIRY TOMORROW THINGS CHANGE DRAMATICALLY, THAT SUDDENLY DRAMATICALLY, THAT SUDDENLY WITNESSES LIKE DON McGAHN, WHO WITNESSES LIKE DON McGAHN, WHO HAVE BEEN RESISTING COMING IN HAVE BEEN RESISTING COMING IN ARE GOING TO SHOW UP AND SAY, ARE GOING TO SHOW UP AND SAY, OKAY, WHERE DO I TESTIFY.

OKAY, WHERE DO I TESTIFY.

THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS GOING THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS GOING TO OPEN ITS FILES.

TO OPEN ITS FILES.

NONE OF THAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.

NONE OF THAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.

WE’RE STILL GOING TO HAVE TO GO WE’RE STILL GOING TO HAVE TO GO TO COURT.

TO COURT.

IF ANYTHING, THE ADMINISTRATION IF ANYTHING, THE ADMINISTRATION WILL DIG IN DEEPER BECAUSE WE’VE WILL DIG IN DEEPER BECAUSE WE’VE GOT TO SORT OF DEFCON FIVE.

GOT TO SORT OF DEFCON FIVE.

>> YOUR REACTION TO THAT? >> YOUR REACTION TO THAT? >> I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE >> I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE PRESIDENT’S REACTION IS GOING TO PRESIDENT’S REACTION IS GOING TO BE IF WE BEGIN AN IMPEACHMENT BE IF WE BEGIN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.

INQUIRY.

WE’VE SEEN A REALLY STRONG WE’VE SEEN A REALLY STRONG PATTERN OF CONTINUING TO, IN PATTERN OF CONTINUING TO, IN FACT, OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND DEFY FACT, OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND DEFY THE RULE OF LAW, BUT MY JOB IS THE RULE OF LAW, BUT MY JOB IS TO DO WHAT IS REQUIRED AND TO TO DO WHAT IS REQUIRED AND TO MOVE FORWARD.

MOVE FORWARD.

I THINK IT WOULD BE VERY I THINK IT WOULD BE VERY UNFORTUNATE IF THE PRESIDENT UNFORTUNATE IF THE PRESIDENT CONTINUES DOWN THIS PATTERN.

CONTINUES DOWN THIS PATTERN.

I VERY MUCH HOPE THAT PEOPLE I VERY MUCH HOPE THAT PEOPLE WILL COME IN, THEY WILL TESTIFY, WILL COME IN, THEY WILL TESTIFY, THEY’LL PROVIDE THE INFORMATION THEY’LL PROVIDE THE INFORMATION THE HOUSE NEEDS TO MAKE A THE HOUSE NEEDS TO MAKE A DECISION, AND IN THE MEANTIME, I DECISION, AND IN THE MEANTIME, I HAVE LOTS OF OTHER THINGS THAT HAVE LOTS OF OTHER THINGS THAT I’M WORKING ON, INCLUDING SOME I’M WORKING ON, INCLUDING SOME THINGS I HOPE TO WORK WITH THIS THINGS I HOPE TO WORK WITH THIS PRESIDENT ON SUCH AS PRESIDENT ON SUCH AS PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICING AND PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICING AND TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE.

INFRASTRUCTURE.

I WAS REALLY DISCOURAGED THAT I WAS REALLY DISCOURAGED THAT THE PRESIDENT SAID SO LONG AS WE THE PRESIDENT SAID SO LONG AS WE ARE READING THE MUELLER REPORT ARE READING THE MUELLER REPORT AND DOING OUR JOB OF OVERSIGHT AND DOING OUR JOB OF OVERSIGHT HE’S NOT WILLING TO WORK WITH US HE’S NOT WILLING TO WORK WITH US ON THE SUBSTANTIVE PRIORITIES ON THE SUBSTANTIVE PRIORITIES AND THE PROBLEMS FACING THE AND THE PROBLEMS FACING THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY.

PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY.

I THINK THAT’S REALLY WRONG.

I THINK THAT’S REALLY WRONG.

>> WERE YOU UNDER PRESSURE ON >> WERE YOU UNDER PRESSURE ON THIS DECISION FROM ONE SIDE OR THIS DECISION FROM ONE SIDE OR THE OTHER? THE OTHER? >> I THINK THERE’S BEEN A LOT OF >> I THINK THERE’S BEEN A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS GOING ON AMONGST CONVERSATIONS GOING ON AMONGST MY COLLEAGUES AND I’VE CERTAINLY MY COLLEAGUES AND I’VE CERTAINLY BEEN PART OF THOSE BEEN PART OF THOSE CONVERSATIONS, BUT I THINK CONVERSATIONS, BUT I THINK ANYBODY WHO HAS SEEN ME TESTIFY ANYBODY WHO HAS SEEN ME TESTIFY — EXCUSE ME, ANYBODY WHO HAS — EXCUSE ME, ANYBODY WHO HAS SEEN ME WITH WITNESSES SEEN ME WITH WITNESSES TESTIFYING BEFORE THE HOUSE TESTIFYING BEFORE THE HOUSE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE KNOW I’M NOT EASY TO PUSH KNOW I’M NOT EASY TO PUSH AROUND.

AROUND.

I LIKE TO LISTEN.

I LIKE TO LISTEN.

I LIKE TO LEARN.

I LIKE TO LEARN.

I LIKE TO RESEARCH.

I LIKE TO RESEARCH.

I LIKE TO DELIBERATE.

I LIKE TO DELIBERATE.

ULTIMATELY THIS IS MY JOB TO ULTIMATELY THIS IS MY JOB TO REPRESENT THE CONSTITUENTS OF REPRESENT THE CONSTITUENTS OF THE 45th DISTRICT AND I HAD TO THE 45th DISTRICT AND I HAD TO MAKE UP MY OWN MIND AND THAT’S MAKE UP MY OWN MIND AND THAT’S WHAT I DID HERE.

WHAT I DID HERE.

>> YOU’RE IN THE BIGGEST >> YOU’RE IN THE BIGGEST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IN THE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IN THE CONGRESS, OF COURSE, THE CONGRESS, OF COURSE, THE CALIFORNIA CONGRESSIONAL CALIFORNIA CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT.

DISTRICT.

IT HAS THE MOST POWERFUL LEADER IT HAS THE MOST POWERFUL LEADER OF A CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION OF A CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION WHO HAPPENS TO BE SPEAKER OF THE WHO HAPPENS TO BE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE NANCY PELOSI.

HOUSE NANCY PELOSI.

HAS THIS MADE HER SITUATION MORE HAS THIS MADE HER SITUATION MORE DIFFICULT? DIFFICULT? DID YOU SPEAK TO THE SPEAKER DID YOU SPEAK TO THE SPEAKER BEFORE MAKING YOUR ANNOUNCEMENT? BEFORE MAKING YOUR ANNOUNCEMENT? >> OF COURSE I WENT AND TOLD THE >> OF COURSE I WENT AND TOLD THE SPEAKER WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO.

SPEAKER WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO.

THAT’S VERY COMMON.

THAT’S VERY COMMON.

WE DO THIS WITH ALL KINDS OF WE DO THIS WITH ALL KINDS OF ISSUES, WHETHER THEY’RE SMALL OR ISSUES, WHETHER THEY’RE SMALL OR LARGE.

LARGE.

WE ALWAYS TRY TO KEEP THE WE ALWAYS TRY TO KEEP THE SPEAKER INFORMED.

SPEAKER INFORMED.

AND I THINK, LOOK, THE SPEAKER AND I THINK, LOOK, THE SPEAKER HERE IS MAKING ROOM FOR EACH HERE IS MAKING ROOM FOR EACH MEMBER TO DO THEIR DUTY TO THEIR MEMBER TO DO THEIR DUTY TO THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND TO THIS CONSTITUENTS AND TO THIS COUNTRY.

COUNTRY.

SHE’S MAKING SPACE FOR EACH SHE’S MAKING SPACE FOR EACH PERSON TO READ THE MUELLER PERSON TO READ THE MUELLER REPORT, TO ASK QUESTIONS, TO REPORT, TO ASK QUESTIONS, TO TALK WITH CHAIRMEN, TO HEAR TALK WITH CHAIRMEN, TO HEAR ABOUT THE INVESTIGATIONS, SEE ABOUT THE INVESTIGATIONS, SEE WHAT THE COURTS ARE DECIDING.

WHAT THE COURTS ARE DECIDING.

SO I VIEW THIS AS A FORM OF SO I VIEW THIS AS A FORM OF LEADERSHIP IN THE SENSE THAT LEADERSHIP IN THE SENSE THAT SHE’S GIVING US EACH THE SHE’S GIVING US EACH THE OPPORTUNITY TO REACH OUR OPPORTUNITY TO REACH OUR CONCLUSION, BUT WHEN I MADE UP CONCLUSION, BUT WHEN I MADE UP MY MIND, I FELT I HAD A DUTY TO MY MIND, I FELT I HAD A DUTY TO BE HONEST WITH MY CONSTITUENTS BE HONEST WITH MY CONSTITUENTS ABOUT WHERE I WAS.

ABOUT WHERE I WAS.

>> AND WHEN YOU TOLD THE SPEAKER >> AND WHEN YOU TOLD THE SPEAKER THIS WAS YOUR POSITION, WHAT DID THIS WAS YOUR POSITION, WHAT DID SHE TELL YOU? SHE TELL YOU? >> SHE SAYS THAT SHE RESPECTED >> SHE SAYS THAT SHE RESPECTED THAT EVERY PERSON NEEDED TO DO THAT EVERY PERSON NEEDED TO DO WHAT THEY THINK IS RIGHT, AND I WHAT THEY THINK IS RIGHT, AND I THINK THAT SHE’S BEEN VERY THINK THAT SHE’S BEEN VERY CONSISTENT IN THAT RESPONSE CONSISTENT IN THAT RESPONSE ACROSS DIFFERENT PEOPLE WHO HAVE ACROSS DIFFERENT PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD DIFFERENT RESPONSES AND HAD DIFFERENT RESPONSES AND DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO IMPEACHMENT.

IMPEACHMENT.

SHE’S A VERY STRONG, CONFIDENT SHE’S A VERY STRONG, CONFIDENT LEADER AND SHE KNOWS THAT PEOPLE LEADER AND SHE KNOWS THAT PEOPLE ARE SOMETIMES GOING TO DISAGREE ARE SOMETIMES GOING TO DISAGREE WITH HER.

WITH HER.

THEY’RE SOMETIMES GOING TO GET THEY’RE SOMETIMES GOING TO GET TO CERTAIN PLACES BEFORE SHE TO CERTAIN PLACES BEFORE SHE DOES, BUT SHE MAKES SPACE FOR DOES, BUT SHE MAKES SPACE FOR THAT.

THAT.

THAT’S HER JOB.

THAT’S HER JOB.

THAT’S WHAT MAKES HER A TERRIFIC THAT’S WHAT MAKES HER A TERRIFIC LEADER, SHE ALLOWS TO US DO OUR LEADER, SHE ALLOWS TO US DO OUR OPEN JOBS WITH OUR OWN.