TOLD IN BOSTON, DOCTORS SAY HIS CONDITION IS LISTED AS GOOD.

♫ ♫ ♫ ALSO DEVELOPING, NANCY PELOSI SAYING SHE FEELS NO PRESSURE TO JOIN HER FELLOW DEMOCRATS CALLING FOR AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY INTO PRESIDENT TRUMP PRESIDENT ROUHANI BUT NOTING IF THAT IS THE ROUTE THEY PURSUE AND THERE IS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, ONLY IMPEACHMENT AS A STRONG REPRIMAND.

>> ONE VISIT RISE ABOVE ALL THE OTHER STUFF? >> WHEN WE STOP FINDING EVEN MORE INFORMATION.

AS I SAY, THIS RUNS DEEP.

EVERY DAY WE SEE MORE.

WHY WOULD WE STOP WITH A LESS STRONG CASE? I THINK IT’S A WAY OUT.

IF YOU WILL GO, YOU HAVE TO GO.

IF THE GOODS ARE THERE, YOU MUST IMPEACH.

>> Sandra: HERE NOW DAN BONGINO, THE HOST OF THE DAN BONGINO SHOW, JUAN WILLIAMS, THE COHOST OF THE FIVE.

NANCY PELOSI SAID POLITICS ARE NOT AT PLAY HERE, THIS WAS A ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION HOSTED BY CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR AND SHE REALLY TAKES INTO THIS CONVERSATION.

POLITICS NOT AT PLAY? >> THAT IS HILARIOUS.

WHILE THE RIDICULOUS THINGS SAID IN WASHINGTON, D.

C.

, NANCY PELOSI HINTING THAT POLITICS AREN’T AT PLAY IN A IMPEACHMENT TALK? IMPEACHMENT FOR WATCH? WINNING AN ELECTION? HE WAS THE BIGGEST VICTIM OF THE SPYING SCANDAL AND U.

S.

HISTORY,HE WAS THE BIGGEST VICTIM OF THE SPYING SCANDAL AND U.

S.

HISTORY, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE THAT WOULD BE A REMOTELY CONVINCING COURT CASE.

IT WAS ABSURD.

THAT IS WHY SHE IS TRYING TO TAMP DOWN THIS UTTERLY ABSURD TALK.

>> Sandra: SHE SUGGESTED THEY HAVE EVIDENCE BUT THEY NEED TO GATHER MORE.

THERE IS EVIDENCE, SHOULD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BE PRIVY TO THAT? >> THERE IS EVIDENCE, I DON’T MOST PEOPLE HAVE READ THE MUELLER REPORT, TEN SPECIFIC ITEMS OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND SAYS IT’S UP TO THE CONGRESS.

>> Sandra: WHY WAIT? >> I THINK BECAUSE NANCY PELOSI THINKS THAT IF YOU SIMPLY PROCEED WITH IMPEACHMENT KNOWING THAT THE SENATE’S MAJORITY HELD BY REPUBLICANS AS UNLIKELY THE PRESIDENT WOULD BE CONVICTED AND THEREFORE THE IMPEACHMENT REALLYPRESIDENT WOULD BE CONVICTED AND THEREFORE THE IMPEACHMENT REALLYWOULD NOT REMOVE HIM FROM OFFICE WOULD NOT REMOVE HIM FROM OFFICE AND WOULD ALLOW HIM TO CLAIM THAT HE IS A MARTYR TO SOME KIND OF POLITICAL FACT, I WANT TO CONTRADICT WHAT HE SAID BECAUSE I THINK NANCY PELOSI IS UNDER PRESSURE FROM DEMOCRATS WHO THINK, FORGET THE POLITICS ON IF IT HELPS US, THE CONGRESS HAS A RESPONSIBILITY UNDER ITS CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION AS A FIRST MEMBER OF THE GOVERNMENT, THE THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT TO HOLD THE FUTURE PRESIDENTS IFTHE THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT TO HOLD THE FUTURE PRESIDENTS IF THEY SEE THIS GUY’S BEHAVIOR.

>> Sandra: SHE GOES EVEN FURTHER IN THIS DISCUSSION AND SHE TALKS ABOUT HER LACK OF TRUST FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL BARR.

>> SPEAK WILL BE HAVING ACCESS TO LESS REDACTED VERSIONS OF THE MUELLER REPORT, I’VE ACCEPTED THAT BECAUSE I’M A FRAYED, I DON’T TRUST THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.

>> Sandra: THAT’S A BIG STATEMENT.

>> I’M NOT REALLY SURE WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT HERE, MY FRIEND WHO I RESPECT GREATLY, THERE IS EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE SO LET’S BE CLEAR, YOU HAVE THE FORMER FBI DIRECTOR WHO WAS A SKILLED LAWYER WITH A 30-YEAR PUBLIC SERVICE AND HE HAD OBSTRUCTION BECAUSE HE WAS BEING A NICE GUY HE DIDN’T CHARGE IT? I DID READ THE MUELLER REPORT, AND EAT McCABE WAS ASKED UNDER OATH BY MARCO RUBIO IF THERE WAS ANY EFFORT TO OBSTRUCT THE CASE AND HE SAID NO.

YOU HAVE SOME INFORMATION THAT BOB MUELLER AND ANTI-McCABE DON’T? I DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

>> WHAT WE HEARD FROM ROBERT MUELLER WAS THAT BECAUSE OF POLICY HE DID NOT THINK IT WAS HIS PLACE TO INDICT A SITTING PRESIDENT.

>> THAT IS NOT WHAT HE SAID.

THERE ARE THREE WITNESSES AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THAT HAVE HIM SAY THE OPPOSITE.

THAT IS NOT CORRECT.

IT’S NOT IN THE REPORT.

>> Sandra: I WANT TO ASK YOU WHAT DIRECTION YOU WANT TO SEE YOUR PARTY GO IN? NOW THE CALLS ARE FOR ROBERT MUELLER TO TESTIFY, GET HIM UP THERE, SUBPOENA HIM IF YOU HAVE TO DO.

WHERE IS YOUR PARTY GOING WITH US? >> I THINK THERE IS SUCH PRESSURE COMING FROM THE FACE OF THE PARTY TO SAY LISTEN, DO NOT RELENT, DON’T GIVE UP BECAUSE YOU LOOK AT BILL BARR AND THIS IS WHAT NANCY PELOSI IS TALKING ABOUT, HE THINKS IT WILL LEAD PEOPLE TO THINK THERE IS NOTHING THERE.

>> Sandra: THAT’S A BIG STATEMENT.

>> THE QUESTION IS, IS IT SMART AND DO YOU DO IT IN SUCH A WAY AND DO YOU DO IT IN SUCH A WAY WAY — >> Sandra: I HAVE TO GO.